IMG_0414BLUE

BRAMPTON CHILD PORNOGRAPHY LAWYER

Statistics Canada has reported that in the last decade, there has been a 233% jump in total child pornography incidents. Statistics Canada also reported that from 2008 to 2016, there was a Canada-wide 41% increase in child pornography incidents, with a total of 6,245 incidents in 2016. A report from the Peel Police indicates an increase in child exploitation online. The 2017 report exhibited an increase in the number of people in Mississauga and Brampton who were charged with “online victimization of children.” In 2017, there were a total of 48 people in Mississauga and Brampton who were charged with child pornography offences. This is a slight increase from 2016, but a very large jump from 2009 where 25 individuals were charged. In 2010, there was a 16% increase in child pornography complaints in Mississauga and Brampton.

The Brampton courthouse is located at 7755 Hurontario Street in Brampton, Ontario. The courthouse is formally called the A. Grenville & William Davis Courthouse. The Superior Court of Justice and the Ontario Court of Justice for Brampton can be reached at 905-456-4700. The Crown Attorney for the Brampton courthouse can be contacted at 905-456-4777 by telephone or 905-456-4780 by fax. If you are looking for information about your upcoming court appearance in Brampton, that information can be found here.

The Firm has defended a number of High Profile Child Pornography allegations where Microsoft and Goolge have sent cyber tips to the National Child Exploitation Coordination Centre (NCECC)  located in the United States, which have ultimately been used as a basis for Production Orders from Rogers Communication and Bell by Toronto, Halton and Peel Police. In the Firm’s R. v. J.A. [2017], Ontario Police ICE Unit received a Cyber Tip from the National Child Exploitation Coordination Centre (NCECC) and the FBI, who received a complaint from the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), located in the United States. Ultimately the Firm secured a withdrawal of both Possession and Distribution of Child Pornography in Guelph. The Firm also defends a number of offenders caught on the Darknet, including where offenders attempt to use anonymous file sharing software, private networks or Tor Browser to avoid detection, such as its R. v. J.T. [2019].

For more information on child pornography offences, click here. Our firm also conducts in-house child pornography forensics in Toronto to assist with your relevant defences. For information on our forensics practice, click here.

Global News: Can an airline tell you to stop recording and delete a cellphone video?

Métro Montréal: Avec le temps chaud, il n’y a pas que le mercure qui grimpe: le nombre de cas de voyeurisme aussi.

CityNews: As the temperatures outside get warmer, police say the reported number of cases of voyeurism tend to rise.

VICE News: An Image Site is Victimizing Women and Little Can be Done.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Child Pornography?
What does “Distributing” Child Pornography Mean?
How can “Distributing” Child Pornography be Proved?
What does “Making Child Pornography Mean?
What does “Possession” of Child Pornography Mean?
How can “Possession” of Child Pornography be Proved?
What does “Accessing” Child Pornography Mean?
How can “Access” of Child Pornography be Proved?
Child Pornography Sentencing.
Child Pornography Defences.

Additional Resources

Consequences of a Criminal Record
Child Pornography Forensics
Immigration Consequences
Keeping Charges Private
Travel & US Waivers

What is Child Pornography?

Section 163.1 (1) of the Criminal Code defines what child pornography means. There are four categories which the Criminal Code explains are defined as child pornography:

Section 163.1(1)(a) explains child pornography can be either a photo, film, video, or other visual representation that shows a person who either is, or is depicted to be, under eighteen years old and is engaged in, or is depicted as, engaging in explicit sexual activity or either a photo, film, video, or other visual representation which has a dominant characteristic of depicting a sexual organ or the anal region of a person under the age of eighteen years for a sexual purpose.

Section 161.1(1)(b) describes how child pornography may be “any written material, visual representation or audio recording that advocates or counsels sexual activity with a person under the age of eighteen years”.

Section 161.1(1)(c) explains how written materials which have a dominant characteristic which is the description, for a sexual purpose, of sexual activity with a minor (under eighteen years) would be an offence.

Finally, section 163.1(1)(d) explains that any audio recording that has a dominant characteristic of description, presentation, or representation of sexual activity with a person under the age of eighteen years for a sexual purpose is considered to be child pornography.

What does “Distributing” Child Pornography Mean?

 There are two ways in which an individual can receive a conviction under section 163.1(3) for distribution of child pornography in Brampton. The accused must either (a) transmit, or make available child pornography, or (b) possess child pornography for the purpose of transmission, making available, distribution, sale, advertising, or exportation.

How can “Distributing” Child Pornography be Proved?

In order to prove that an individual distributed child pornography, the Brampton Crown must show that the accused had subjective knowledge of the child pornographic material contained in the video, film, photo, written material, audio recording, or other visual representation. It is not sufficient for the Brampton Crown to only prove recklessness. To prove distribution of child pornography in Brampton, one of the following must be established by the Crown:

(1) intent by the accused to make child pornography materials accessible to others through the use of a file sharing program or something similar,

(2) the accused had knowledge that they were making file sharing programs available to others, or

(3) wilful blindness by the accused. This can be established by proof that the accused’s made child pornographic files available to others through a file sharing program coupled with a suspicion by the accused that they had done so. However, the accused took no steps to determine if this suspicion was true.

What does “Making” Child Pornography Mean?

In order to be convicted for making child pornography, an individual must create novel child pornography. That is, an instance of child pornography that differs from existing instances of child pornography. No cases after 2008 have stated that downloading and then transmitting child pornography on to a disk amounts to making child pornography in Brampton. The “maker” of the child pornography is the individual who controls or directs the production of novel child pornography.

What does “Possession” of Child Pornography Mean?

Possession of child pornography in Brampton requires that the accused have possession of the underlying data files in some way. Solely viewing an image online is not sufficient to prove possession. The subject matter being “possessed” is simply the file itself, not the child pornography that is found within the file. For this reason, it is not necessary that the accused actually have viewed the content of the file. It is only necessary that the accused be aware of the underlying illegal nature of the file being stored on their computer. The possession of the file begins at the time the accused initiates the downloading of the file, not the time at which the downloading of the file is completed. Solely accessing a child pornography website or viewing a child pornography image onscreen is not enough to prove possession of child pornography in Brampton.

How can “Possession” of Child Pornography be Proved?

In order to prove possession of child pornography in Brampton under section 163.1(4) of the Criminal Code, the Brampton Crown Attorney should be able to prove:

(1) the identity of the accused as the culprit,

(2) the date and time of the incident of child pornography,

(3) the jurisdiction of the child pornography (including both region and province),

(4) the culprit possessed a photo, film, video, other visual representation, written material, or audio recording,

(5) the photo, film, video, other visual representation, written material, or audio recording were child pornography, and

(6) the culprit knew or was wilfully blind to the nature of the above materials.

With all forms of possession of child pornography, the Brampton Crown Attorney is required to prove that the accused had knowledge and control of the materials.

In order to prove personal possession of child pornography in Brampton, the Crown must prove that there was:

(1) physical contact with the file,

(2) knowledge of the criminal character of the file, and

(3) a degree of control over the file.

In order to prove constructive possession of child pornography in Brampton, the Crown must prove that the accused:

(1) had knowledge of the character of the object,

(2) knowingly put or kept the object in a particular place, and

(3) intended to have the object in the place for his/her “use of benefit” or that of another person.

What does “Accessing” Child Pornography Mean? 

Accessing child pornography in Brampton is separate from the above-mentioned offence of possession of child pornography. This offence was created to capture individuals who are intentionally viewing child pornography on the internet, but do not meet the legal notion of possession. Accessing child pornography requires knowingly viewing or transmitting child pornography to oneself. Not included in this definition are instances of “inadvertent viewing”, where the individual opens a file containing child pornography but is unaware of the file’s criminal character.

Accessing child pornography can be differentiated from possessing child pornography based on how the file is stored. Storing a file in a cache (a temporary internet file) indicates that an individual is accessing the child pornography, while downloading the file to an individual’s hard drive is indicative of possession of child pornography. Solely storing a child pornography file as a temporary internet file does not equate to an offense of accessing child pornography, as this cannot be inferred to mean the accused knew of the presence of the file, viewed it, or intended to save it. Accessing child pornography in Brampton may include: evidence of browsing child pornographic sites, indicators of frequent downloading of child pornographic materials, and the saving of links to child pornographic sites.

How can “Access” of Child Pornography be Proved?

In order to prove access of child pornography under section 163.1(4.1) of the Criminal Code, the Brampton Crown Attorney should be able to prove:

(1) the identity of the accused as the culprit,

(2) the date and time of the incident of child pornography,

(3) the jurisdiction of the child pornography (including both region and province),

(4) the culprit obtained access to a photo, film, video, other visual representation, written material, or audio recording,

(5) the photo, film, video, other visual representation, written material, or audio recording were child pornography, and

(6) the culprit knew or was wilfully blind to the nature of the above materials.

Child Pornography Sentencing

Child pornography offences are sentenced based on the type of offence the accused is charged with. An accused may be charged with making, distributing, possessing, or accessing child pornography. Each offence carries with it different imprisonment terms.

When the offence involves the abuse of an individual aged zero to seventeen, s. 718.01 of the Criminal Code requires the sentencing judge to give consideration to the objectives of denunciation and deterrence. Abuse of an individual aged zero to seventeen will also be considered as an aggravating factor for the judge to consider when sentencing the accused. Additionally, if the offender holds a position of trust or authority over the victim (e.g., they are a teacher or coach of the accused) this will also be an aggravating factor that the judge considers during sentencing.

The offences of making and distributing child pornography (enumerated in sections 163.1(2) and (3) of the Criminal Code) are indictable offences. These offences carry a maximum penalty of 14 years incarceration.

The offences of possessing and accessing child pornography (enumerated in sections 163.1(4) and (4.1) of the Criminal Code) are hybrid offences. If the Brampton Crown choses to proceed by indictment, the maximum penalty is 10 years incarceration. If the Brampton Crown chooses to proceed by summary conviction, the maximum penalty is two years less a day.

Child Pornography Defences 

There are two statutory defences and one common law defence for child pornography. The first defence is that of a “reasonable belief in age”. However, an accused cannot rely on this defence unless they take reasonable steps to obtain the victim’s age. The second defence is the “public good defence”. This defence is an exception where conduct that would otherwise be seen as criminal is not because the content of the alleged child pornography is enumerated for a public good and does not pose an undue risk of harm to any individuals under the age of eighteen years. The final defence is that of accidental download. In order for an accused to rely on this defence, they must provide evidence supporting this, rather than just speculating it. Factors that can help prove this defence include a low number of child pornography files present on the computer. A large number of child pornography files will permit the Brampton Crown to infer that the accused was actively searching and downloading files, and thus they cannot rely on this defence. As well, the manner in which the child pornography files were stored also contributes to this defence, as well as the number of places in which the child pornography files were saved.

416-DEFENCE | 416-333-3623