
Toronto Licensing Tribunal Lawyers
The Toronto Licence Tribunal (TLT) plays an indispensable role within Toronto’s administrative system. The Tribunal is an independent quasi-judicial body that is comprised of several members—seven, to be exact—who are appointed by the City of Toronto. The Tribunal’s hearings are ordinarily open for the public to see. This is to ensure transparency and accountability. Hearings are typically held every Thursday. Most importantly, the Tribunal is obligated to render its decisions free of political or business intervention, or any other conflicts of interest, to ensure that the Tribunal is unbiased.
The Tribunal works to ensure that decisions involving various licenses, permits, and registrations are fair, just, and transparent. This Tribunal offers a formal avenue for individuals and businesses to challenge decisions made by city officials that might impact their operations and livelihoods. It is highly significant for all persons involved in the appeals process to thoroughly understand the TLT’s functions, methods, and the broader repercussions of its decisions.
What is the function of the Toronto Licence Tribunal (TLT)?
The Toronto Licence Tribunal serves as an independent adjudicative body. Its duty is to review and resolve disputes and conflicts pertaining to licensing decisions that are made by city officials. Its chief role is to ensure that these decisions are fair, transparent, and done in accordance with municipal bylaws and regulations. Furthermore, the TLT deals with appeals pertaining to a wide variety of issues. Such issues might encompass business licences, taxi and limousine licences, building permits, and so on. The TLT helps maintain a balanced and fair approach to licensing through offering a platform for appellants to present their case and advocate for themselves.
Such a balanced legal approach is highly significant when it comes to ensuring that individuals and businesses are treated in a fair and equitable manner. The Tribunal’s decisions can uphold, modify, or overturn the original decisions. As such, the Tribunal plays a highly important role in the administrative justice system of Toronto.
The Tribunal has authority to approve or decline a licence application; approve or refuse to renew a licence; place conditions on a licence; and suspend or revoke the licence.

- CP24: Civil Sexual Assault Lawsuit at St. Michael’s in Toronto.
- Global News Morning Show: Sentencing Arguments in Assault case of Dafonte Miller.
- Breakfast Television: Role of Mental Health in Court Proceedings.
- Global News National: Bruce McArthur will not serve consecutive sentences.
- CBC Radio: Interview with Mayor John Tory and Jordan Donich on CBC Radio.
- CTV News National: Handgun ban supported by majority of Canadians: Nanos survey.
- Global News: How difficult is it to get a legal handgun in Canada.
- CP24: Sentencing Hearing for Chair Girl.


How does the appeal process work at the TLT?
The appeal process at the Toronto Licence Tribunal is intended to be a thorough and fair process. It permits appellants to challenge decisions that they believe are unjust. The process begins with an individual filing a formal appeal. This has to be filed within a specified time frame, typically 30 days from the date of the original decision.
This is followed by a pre-hearing conference which serves to clarify concerns, exchange documents, and discuss any possible settlements. The actual hearing is a formal proceeding in which both the appellant and the city official present their facts and arguments. Witnesses might be called, and cross-examination is permitted to ensure a thorough examination into the facts. Following the hearing, the Tribunal members will deliberate and make a written decision. This decision is ultimately based on the information given and the applicable laws and regulations.
What Kinds of Cases does the TLT hear?
The Toronto Licence Tribunal deals with a wide range of cases involving the issuance, suspension, revocation, and restrictions of various licenses and permits. These include licenses for restaurants, bars, retail establishments, and personal services like massage parlours and tattoo shops. The TLT also handles appeals for taxi and limousine licences, tow truck licences, and driving school licences. It also tackles disputes over building permits and zoning compliance. Each case is unique, reflecting the wide range of activities governed by the city. The Tribunal’s mandate is to guarantee that all of these operations follow city legislation and that any disputes are treated fairly and transparently. By handling such a broad range of matters, the TLT helps ensure order and compliance as per the city’s regulatory framework.
Understanding Workplace Investigations
What are the potential outcomes of a TLT hearing?
The outcomes of a Toronto Licence Tribunal hearing can vary depending on the specifics of the case and the evidence presented. The Tribunal has the authority to uphold the original decision made by the city official, which means the licence or permit in question remains denied, suspended, revoked, or subject to conditions. Alternatively, the Tribunal can modify the original decision, perhaps by changing the conditions attached to a licence or by reducing the severity of a penalty. In some cases, the Tribunal may overturn the original decision entirely, granting the appellant the licence or permit they sought or reinstating a previously suspended or revoked licence. These decisions are carefully deliberated by the Tribunal members, who consider all the evidence and legal arguments before reaching a conclusion. The written decision gives a detailed explanation of the rationale behind the outcome.
How can TLT decisions be appealed, and what are the grounds for such appeals?
Decisions made by the Toronto Licence Tribunal can be appealed to the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario. To initiate an appeal, the appellant must file a Notice of Appeal within a specific period, usually 30 days from the date of the Tribunal’s decision. The grounds for appeal typically include errors of law, procedural unfairness, or the unreasonableness of the decision based on the evidence presented. Errors of law refer to situations where the Tribunal may have misinterpreted or misapplied relevant legal principles. Procedural unfairness might occur if there were irregularities or discrepancies in the hearing process that compromised its fairness. An appeal based on unreasonableness challenges the Tribunal’s decision as being unjustified or irrational given the facts and evidence. During the appeal process, the Superior Court reviews the Tribunal’s decision and the grounds for appeal, conducting a hearing where both parties can present their arguments. The Court may uphold the Tribunal’s decision, modify it, or remit the matter back to the Tribunal for a new hearing.
Recent Cases
Allo v. Licence Appeal Tribunal et al., 2022 ONSC 6368
In this case, the claimant challenged the Tribunal’s decision to deny an adjournment of a hearing. The Court denied the appeal, arguing that the denial constituted an interlocutory action not subject to appeal. However, the Court permitted the claimant to change the appeal to judicial review if sufficient comments were presented within ten days. The case here shows us the procedural limitations and flexible opportunities for judicial review in Tribunal decisions.
This case involves the revocation of Minx Spa’s license due to a number of by-law convictions and charges. The Tribunal’s decision affirmed the revocation. This case ultimately shows us how important it is for all individuals to comply with local standards and bylaws, as well as ensuring public safety. This Tribunal case plays a significant role in exemplifying the mechanisms in which the Tribunal can enforce license standards as well as the penalties of non-compliance.
B.S. v. Toronto Licensing Tribunal
In this case, B.S. applied for a Vehicle-For-Hire Driver’s Licence. The Tribunal approved a joint Proposed Resolution, signed on the day of the hearing, to issue the licence with several rigorous conditions. Firstly, B.S. is required to submit all necessary fees, documents, and outstanding requirements within 30 days, failing which the licence could be cancelled. Upon issuance, the licence will be placed on probation for one year, during which Municipal Licensing and Standards (MLS) will conduct additional checks on B.S.’s driving, criminal, and by-law records to ensure compliance with the Municipal Code and other applicable laws.
Before the next renewal, B.S. had to give an up-to-date copy of his Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Check. Furthermore, any new charges or concerns raised during the probationary term may result in the case being brought back before the Tribunal for a full hearing. B.S. attended the hearing and demonstrated that they are conforming with the Tribunal’s procedures and rules.
The decisions from these cases are a perfect example of the Tribunal’s balanced approach in licensing issues. These cases put in the forefront the notions of due process as well as public safety. The continuation of B.S.’s licence suspension and the probationary conditions imposed on B.S. new licence indicate the Tribunal’s commitment to comprehensive oversight.
The objective of the Tribunal is to help ensure that persons who possess certain licences comply to the required and expected standards of conduct. The Tribunal accomplishes this by requiring that the individual to provide updated criminal records. The Tribunal also allows for further examination and/or investigations into the individual during the probation period.