Donich Law - Jordan Donich - Courtroom Sketch

Minimum Wage in Ontario

Minimum wage refers to the lowest hourly rate that a company is allowed to pay an employee. The province of Ontario is responsible for setting and enforcing the laws regarding minimum wage. The point of having minimum wage laws is to provide a base wage, or a form of “safety net,” to ensure that employees are adequately compensated for their work. This ultimately helps to reduce the risk of worker exploitation. Most employees, regardless of their employment status—whether full-time, part-time, casual, or paid on an hourly, commission, piece rate, flat rate, or salary basis—are entitled to minimum wage.

However, the Employment Standards Act (ESA) minimum wage requirements do not apply to certain jobs. Ontario’s minimum wage rates are expected to increase in October 2024. This increase reflects the 2024 Ontario Consumer Price Index (CPI).

What are the Different Categories of Minimum Wage Workers?

The minimum wage rates in Ontario are based on the ESA. In addition to setting the rates for general minimum wage, the ESA also specifies different rates for specific worker categories, including bartenders, hunting guides, students, and domestic workers. These categories have unique minimum wages due to the perceived distinctions between various kinds of employment and their respective work environments. The general minimum wage is the standard rate applicable to most workers in Ontario, set at $16.55 per hour as of October of 2023.

The student minimum wage applies to students under 18 years of age who work 28 hours a week or less during the school term or during school breaks and summer holidays, with the rate set at $15.60 per hour as of October 1, 2023.

On January 1, 2022, the minimum wage for liquor servers was eliminated. Previously, workers who served alcohol directly to consumers in licensed businesses were paid less. These workers are now eligible for the $16.55 per hour general minimum wage. As of October 1, 2023, the minimum wage for employees who work from home for pay is set at $18.20 per hour. This rate applies to both employers and employees. Workers in specific industries, such as hunting, fishing, and trapping, have unique minimum wages. For these employees, the minimum wage is $82.85 for fewer than five hours worked in a day and $165.75 for five or more hours worked, whether or not the hours are consecutive.

Additionally, the wilderness guides minimum wage applies to employees working as wilderness guides. These specific rates ensure that employees in various sectors are compensated fairly according to the nature of their work and working conditions.

How is Minimum Wage Calculated?

In Ontario, minimum wage is calculated based on hourly rates set by the provincial government. These rates are determined through a combination of factors including inflation, cost of living, economic conditions, and recommendations from advisory panels. The rates are reviewed and adjusted periodically to ensure they remain relevant and fair.

The calculation takes into account the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which measures the average change in prices over time that consumers pay for goods and services. By linking minimum wage increases to the CPI, the government aims to maintain the purchasing power of workers. Employers must ensure that employees are paid at least the minimum wage for all hours worked. This includes time spent on tasks such as training, attending meetings, and any other work-related activities.

Specific categories of workers, such as students, homeworkers, and hunting and fishing guides, have their own set minimum wages that reflect the unique nature of their work. Overall, the calculation of minimum wage in Ontario is designed to provide a basic standard of living for workers while considering the economic health of the province. It is important to note that breaks or lunches are not included in the calculation of one’s wages.

How is Minimum Wage Calculated in Cases where Room-and-Board is Provided?

In Ontario, an employee’s earnings may be reduced by the value of room and board benefits provided by their employer as part of their remuneration, subject to a maximum. The maximum amounts that can be deducted for room and board are specified by the ESA. As per the most recent update, for instance, the highest amount that can be deducted is $31.70 per week for a private room, and $2.55 per meal, up to a maximum of $53.55 per week for meals.

To ensure compliance with minimum wage laws, the calculation involves the following steps: first, determine the total monetary wage earned by the employee; second, add the value of the room-and-board provided, as per the ESA limits; and third, compare this total to the applicable minimum wage rate multiplied by the number of hours worked. If the total compensation (wages plus room-and-board value) does not meet or exceed the minimum wage requirement, the employer must adjust the monetary wage to ensure compliance.

Room and board arrangements and deductions must be documented in detail by the employer, and the employee must sign a written consent form for these deductions. This ensures transparency and fairness in the use of room and board deductions in minimum wage calculations.

Understanding Workplace Investigations

What Happens if a Worker is Sent Home After Only Three Hours?

In Ontario, if an employee who is scheduled to work is sent home after working less than three hours, the employer is required to pay a minimum of three hours’ worth of wages. This rule is known as the “three-hour rule” and is stipulated under the ESA. The purpose of this rule is to compensate employees for their time and inconvenience when they are sent home early, ensuring they receive a minimum amount of pay.

The calculation for this situation involves paying the greater of two amounts: three hours at the employee’s regular wage rate, or the actual time worked at their regular wage rate plus half the remaining time to make up three hours. For example, if an employee’s regular wage rate is $16.55 per hour and they work only one hour before being sent home, they must be paid for at least three hours. Therefore, they would receive either $49.65 (three hours at $16.55) or the actual time worked plus the additional compensation to make up three hours, whichever is greater. This rule ensures that employees are fairly compensated even if their shift is cut short, providing a level of financial stability and fairness in the workplace.

Do Salaried Employees Get Minimum Wage?

In Ontario, salaried employees are also entitled to receive at least the minimum wage. The ESA mandates that the salary paid to these employees, when averaged over the hours worked, meets or exceeds the applicable minimum wage rate. This means that even if an employee is paid a fixed annual or monthly salary, the effective hourly rate must not fall below the minimum wage.

To ensure compliance, the employer must calculate the total wages paid to the salaried employee and divide it by the total number of hours worked in the pay period. If the resulting hourly wage is less than the minimum wage, the employer must adjust the salary to ensure it meets the legal requirement. This applies to both full-time and part-time salaried employees.

Additionally, certain salaried employees may be exempt from minimum wage provisions if they fall under specific categories defined by the ESA, such as managers and supervisors, who perform specific duties that qualify them for exemption. However, for most salaried employees, the minimum wage law applies to ensure fair compensation for all hours worked. Employers must maintain accurate records of hours worked by salaried employees to demonstrate compliance with minimum wage laws, ensuring that all employees receive at least the minimum standard of pay.

Donich Law - In the News
Donich Law - In the News - Media Logos

Breakfast Television

Mental Health Concerns in the Justice System.


The Difference between Criminal and Civil Liability.

CTV News National

The Rise of Gun Violence in Toronto.

Global News

New Changes to Pardons in Canada.

Recent Cases

Ontario Nurses Association v. Participating Nursing Homes, 2019 ONSC 2168

This case addressed the systemic issue of pay equity for nurses and resulted in significant changes to the minimum wage standards for healthcare workers in nursing homes.

Collective bargaining agreements, employee rights, and the interpretation of particular sections within those agreements are the main legal issues. The application of seniority rights, employment advertisements, and the requirements for filling open jobs all play a role in this decision. The key issue was whether the employer’s actions regarding job advertisements and promotions were made in compliance with the collective agreement.

The Tribunal was required to evaluate if the employer’s actions complied with the rules of the collective bargaining agreement, specifically with respect to the workplace values of justice and equity. This involves determining whether the employer appropriately took seniority and qualifications into consideration.

Anderson v. Anderson, 2023 SCC 13

This case deals with important labour and employment law matters, especially those pertaining to minimum wage. In this case, the employees argued that their employer had violated the law by failing to preserve pay equity. The fundamental question was whether wage parity in organizations with a high proportion of women could be maintained without continual comparisons with male job classes.

The Court held that the Pay Equity Act had to be interpreted to mandate the ongoing maintenance of pay equity in conformity with the equality principles established in the Charter. This decision emphasizes how crucial it is for businesses to continually ensure that workers in job classes with a higher percentage of women are paid equitably and fairly, in relation to those in job classes with a higher proportion of males. The ruling will have a significant impact on both combating gender discrimination in the workplace and maintaining fair compensation standards.

Ontario (Attorney General) v. Clark, 2021 SCC 18, [2021] 1 S.C.R. 607

This case deals with important labour and employment law issues, especially those pertaining to minimum wage and public authority responsibilities. The central question was whether the government of Ontario had fulfilled its duties to provide appropriate minimum wage requirements and working conditions for particular categories of workers.

The case revolved around the interpretation of the ESA and whether the Ontario government adequately enforced minimum wage provisions for specific worker categories, especially those in precarious employment—sometimes called unreliable employment.

The Court looked at whether it was the government’s responsibility as a public authority to actively enforce minimum wage legislation and shield weaker workers from exploitation. This raised questions about fairness and equity in labour practices and if systemic discrimination against particular worker groups was caused by government acts or inactions.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified that the ESA sets a clear duty for the government to enforce minimum wage standards uniformly across various employment sectors. Any deviation or laxity in enforcement could lead to significant legal repercussions. The court emphasized the government’s role in safeguarding workers’ rights, ensuring that minimum wage laws are applied effectively and uniformly to prevent exploitation and uphold fair labour practices. The ruling had significant implications for public policy, stressing the need for continuous oversight and proactive measures by the government to enforce labour standards. It highlighted that failure to do so could result in legal accountability and the need for policy reforms.

This ruling reinforces the importance of strict adherence to minimum wage laws and the proactive role of public authorities in protecting workers’ rights. This case serves as a salient reminder that legal and regulatory frameworks have to be carefully enforced to ensure fair and equitable treatment of all employees, especially those in vulnerable or precarious work situations. The ruling reminds us of the kinds of legal consequences that public authorities might face if they fail to uphold these standards. This case helps to promote greater accountability in labour law enforcement.

About the Author

Jordan Donich Profile Photo

Jordan Donich

Jordan Donich has been a Lawyer for over 10 years and is a trusted legal analyst by Canadian Media. He is as a leader in Canada’s tech sector for lawyers and developer of Law Newbie. Jordan is a Black Belt with the Japan Karate Association and trained in Krav Maga. He won a Gold Medal at 2004 Canadian National Championships and was published in the National Newspaper Awards.

Jordan has been featured in Forbes and is a member of DMZ Angels in Toronto.