CVO Defence Lawyers

In Canada, veterinarians are subject to strict licensing, regulation, and education requirements within their individual provinces, just like other professionals. To guarantee that standards are upheld, each province has its own regulations governing its professions. The College of Veterinarians of Ontario (CVO) is responsible for supervising the veterinary medical profession in Ontario. Maintaining the highest professional standards of knowledge and ethics among veterinarians is the primary goal of the CVO in order to ensure a high standard of service. The Veterinarians Act, 1990 is a legislative framework aimed at providing thorough regulation of veterinary practice, which is enforced by the CVO.

Education and Continuing Professional Development

The CVO works to ensure that, before to starting their practices, all veterinarians get relevant, high-quality education from recognized institutions. Continuing education is also necessary for practicing members to stay up to date on developments in the industry. It is required to abide with the Veterinarians Act 1990 in order to safeguard the public from professional misconduct and any harm that might flow from it. Formal complaints against licensed veterinarians are overseen and reviewed by the CVO, which conducts a comprehensive investigation. When unethical or professional misconduct is discovered, the CVO plays a significant role acting as the regulating body with the jurisdiction to punish the guilty practitioner.

Regulatory Framework under the Veterinarians Act, 1990

The CVO enforces the Veterinarians Act 1990, which has a number of rules relevant to veterinary practice. These include professional and fiduciary duties to clients, accreditation requirements, quality control for veterinary facilities, and the establishment and registration of professional veterinary corporations. The Act also sets forth the protocols and procedures for dealing with professional misconduct and disciplining veterinarians who violate the rules of conduct.

How Does Licensing and Registration Work?

To become a licensed veterinarian in Ontario, individuals must meet the criteria set out in the Veterinarians Act 1990. This involves fulfilling specific educational and registration requirements. The Act details the conditions necessary for obtaining a veterinary licence, including exceptions for emergency care provision.

What Framework Governs Professional Misconduct Regulations?

The second part of the Veterinarians Act 1990 speaks to professional misconduct, enumerating acts or omissions considered as such by the CVO. Some instances of this might involve failing to uphold professional standards, violating client confidentiality, providing unnecessary services, misrepresenting services to clients, and charging for unperformed services. The Act also addresses issues such as conflicts of interest, verbal, physical, sexual, or emotional abuse of clients, and non-responsiveness to inquiries from the CVO.

Professional Regulation in Canada

Donich Law - Assault Punishments

How Does the Complaint Process Work?

Veterinarians have a duty of care to their patients. Failing to meet this duty of care can result in formal complaints. Anyone from the public can file a complaint if they believe a veterinarian has acted improperly. Complaints must be submitted in writing or via audio/visual recording to the CVO’s Principal, Investigations, and Resolution department. Complaints should include a detailed statement, the full legal name and address of the veterinarian, and relevant information from other professionals if applicable. Typically, there is no time limit for filing a complaint. This might raise issues if the incident(s) being complained about is so long ago that the veterinarian cannot remember. This makes it difficult to come up with an appropriate defence. It might also increase the possibility that the complainant has implanted false memories.

How are Filed Complaints Handled?

Upon receiving a complaint, the CVO notifies the implicated veterinarian, providing both parties with copies of the complaint. The veterinarian can respond in writing and submit supporting documents. The complainant may also reply to the veterinarian’s explanation. After reviewing all submissions, the CVO determines how to proceed. In less severe cases, mediation may resolve the issue. If mediation does not succeed, the complaint is then advanced to the Complaints Committee for further consideration.

Understanding Workplace Investigations

What is the Role of the Complaints Committee?

The Complaints Committee, consisting of up to ten members including public appointees and veterinarians, are responsible for reviewing all of the relevant materials relating to the complaint. The Committee can make a number of possible decisions, such as to close the file, view the complaint as vexatious or frivolous, provide advice or education to the veterinarian to prevent future infractions, or refer the case to the Discipline Committee for further action.

What are the Penalties for Professional Misconduct?

If the Complaints Committee finds evidence of professional misconduct, the case is referred to the Discipline Committee. The Discipline Committee, upon review, may schedule a hearing presided over by a panel including public members. These hearings might be in the form of a public or private meeting. Outcomes of the meeting can vary widely depending on the veracity of the accusations. The Committee might determine that no misconduct occurred, issue cautions, or, in serious cases, suspend or revoke the veterinarian’s license.

What are the Impacts of Professional Allegations?

Professional misconduct findings significantly impact a veterinarian’s rights to practice. Veterinarians who are notified of a complaint against should immediately seek legal counsel. Our firm provides guidance to ensure the best possible outcome.

How do I Defend Myself Against Formal Complaints?

Defending a formal complaint demands a comprehensive understanding of the allegations against the veterinarian and the relevant facts of the reported incident(s). Immediate legal consultation is highly significant to ensure the best legal outcomes. In cases of unfounded or baseless allegations, veterinarians can defend themselves by asserting that they are in compliance with professional standards. Substantive responses might involve demonstrating adherence to the standard of care and appropriate conduct. Legal counsel can assist in drafting responses to ensure comprehensive addressing of complaints.

Donich Law - In the News
Donich Law - In the News - Media Logos

Breakfast Television

Mental Health Concerns in the Justice System.

CP24

The Difference between Criminal and Civil Liability.

CTV News National

The Rise of Gun Violence in Toronto.

Global News

New Changes to Pardons in Canada.

Recent Law

Dr. J.M. v. College of Veterinarians of Ontario, 2020 ONSC 3039

This case was an appeal of a disciplinary decision that was rendered by the College of Veterinarians of Ontario (COV). Here, the COV ordered a twelve-month suspension on Dr. J.M.’s licence. The suspension was based on allegations of professional misconduct, such as fraudulent advertising, lying to clients about his donations to charity, and failing to keep the required medical records. The College has filed a cross-appeal, challenging the decision to allow Dr. M to run a mobile veterinary business following his suspension. The Court ultimately allowed Dr. Mitelman to continue operating a practice after he had gotten his licence suspended.

B.J. v. College of Veterinarians of British Columbia, 2020 BCSC 1085

Dr. B.J. as well as a few other veterinarians filed a lawsuit against the College and several individuals. They alleged malicious prosecution, misfeasance, and intentional interference with economic relations. The plaintiffs claimed that the College and its members had engaged in discriminatory practices, termed the “Mala Fides Strategy,” targeting Indo-Canadian veterinarians. Dr. B.J. had been previously declared a vexatious/frivolous litigant, which might mean that he had a history of bringing forth claims that were often invalid or baseless. The College sought to strike the claims, arguing they were a collateral attack on previous decisions and statute-barred. The Court ultimately dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims, citing their similarity to already extensively-litigated matters and the plaintiffs’ failure to set aside the relevant prior orders effectively.

This case shows that although there are cases where legal remedies can be sought as a result of the College’s misconduct or bias, there needs to be a valid reason otherwise it might be considered a frivolous and vexatious claim.

About the Author

Jordan Donich Profile Photo

Jordan Donich

Jordan Donich has been a Lawyer for over 10 years and is a trusted legal analyst by Canadian Media. He is as a leader in Canada’s tech sector for lawyers and developer of Law Newbie. Jordan is a Black Belt with the Japan Karate Association and trained in Krav Maga. He won a Gold Medal at 2004 Canadian National Championships and was published in the National Newspaper Awards.

Jordan has been featured in Forbes and is a member of DMZ Angels in Toronto.