Donich Law - Jordan Donich - Courtroom Sketch

Defend Arson Charges

Being charged with a criminal offence can be a scary and stressful experience. This is especially true for a serious offence like arson. Depending on the arson offence, an individual convicted of arson will face significant penalties including up to life in prison. The Criminal Code outlines seven different arson offences: arson disregard for human life, arson damage to property, arson damage to own property, arson for a fraudulent purpose, arson by negligence, and possession of an incendiary material.

If you have been charged with an arson offence it is essential to understand and protect your rights from the outset of the criminal process. The most effective way to accomplish this goal is to retain experienced legal counsel who can guide you through the process and protect your rights. Donich Law has experience defending individuals charged with serious offences including arson and regularly achieve positive results for our clients. The Firm combines risk management and litigation strategies to ensure our clients receive the best defence possible.

What will Happen if I am Charged with Arson in Toronto?

If you have been charged with arson in Toronto, you will have been provided release paperwork with conditions, a first appearance court date, and a time to attend the police station to be fingerprinted and photographed. At the first appearance court date, the accused or their lawyer will attend court and update the court and the Crown on whether the accused has retained counsel. The accused may also ask for an update on whether disclosure is ready and available. A new court date will be set. The accused or their lawyer will continue to attend regular set date appearances to update the Court until the case has concluded.

Disclosure should be made available to the accused electronically at or around the first appearance court date. Disclosure is typically provided bit by bit as it becomes available, often taking a few months to complete. Once disclosure is substantially complete, defence counsel will review it and then schedule a pre-trial with the Crown to discuss. At the pre-trial counsel will discuss issues with the case and whether the accused is anticipated to resolve or go to trial. This is also the accused’s first opportunity to provide the Crown with any evidence of their innocence. Following a Crown pre-trial, a judicial pre-trial may be scheduled. Negotiations will continue between the Crown and defence until dates are set for either a resolution or trial.

What is Arson Endangering Human Life?

The offence of arson endangering human life is outlined in section 433 of the Criminal Code. The Code states that an individual is guilty of an offence where they “intentionally or recklessly causes damage by fire or explosion to property, whether to not that person owns the property, where the person knows that or is reckless with respect to whether the property is uninhabited or occupied, or where fire or explosion causes bodily harm to another person.”

This means that an individual will be guilty of arson endangering human life if they set fire to a residence or any other place a human would reasonably be expected to be knowing or being reckless as to whether someone is inside, even if no one was actually inside or injured. This is true even if the accused owns the property.

For example, an accused person who set fire to their own home without first checking whether their family members were inside may be convicted of arson endangering human life even if their family members were not inside the home.

Stages of the Criminal Justice System

Donich Law - Assault Punishments

How to Defend an Arson Charge?

When developing a defence strategy for an arson charge one must consider which arson offence the accused is charged with. This is likely to influence the defence strategy. The first step in developing a strong defence to an arson charge is to review all the evidence provided by the Crown. The defence may also collect their own evidence where it is available.

The defence strategy must account for each piece of the Crown’s evidence. It is important to remember that the accused is not tasked with proving their innocence. It is the Crown who bears the burden of proving the accused’s guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. For this reason, it is often most effective to attack the Crown’s evidence.

Will I go to Jail for Arson in Toronto?

Prison sentences are routine in cases involving arson in Toronto. This is especially true in cases where the accused is charged with arson endangering life, arson damage to property, and arson damage to own property. While custodial sentences are common for these types of offences, they are not mandatory. An individual convicted of arson endangering life, arson damage to property, and arson damage to own property may be granted a suspended sentence and placed on probation or granted a conditional sentence and permitted to serve their custodial sentence in the community, typically on house arrest.

When determining the appropriate sentence for an individual convicted of an arson offence, the Court will consider aggravating and mitigating factors including the nature and severity of the offence, the background and characteristics of the accused, the impact on any victims, the amount of damage caused, and case law from other similar cases. The more aggravating factors present in a case, the more likely the Court is to sentence the offender to jail.

What’s a Crime in Canada?

What is the Minimum Sentence for Arson?

Pursuant to the Criminal Code, there is no minimum penalty for arson. Some arson offences are, however, straight indictable offences. This means that they are of the most serious offences in the Code and carry severe penalties. The Code provides that arson endangering human life is a straight indictable offence carrying a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Arson damage to property and arson damage to own property are also straight indictable offences, both carrying a maximum penalty of fourteen years in prison.

Arson for fraudulent purpose and arson by negligence are both hybrid offences, meaning the Crown will elect whether they want to prosecute the accused by indictment or by summary conviction. Those prosecuted by indictment face increased penalties. The maximum penalty on indictment for arson for fraudulent purpose in ten years’ imprisonment. Where the Crown elects to proceed by summary conviction the maximum penalty is only two years less a day in prison. The maximum penalty for arson by negligence is five years in prison where the Crown elects to proceed by indictment and two years less a day where the Crown elects to proceed summarily.

Law Newbie is a free AI research assistant that can help you safely answer questions about criminal law.

Learn More

Recent Cases

R. v. C.H., 2025 ONSC 7135

In the 2025 case of R. v. C.H., the Crown sought an order declaring the offender a dangerous offender and imposing an indeterminate prison sentence. The Crown alleged that the offender set fire to his jail cell at the Thunder Bay District Jail. Upon reviewing the evidence presented by the Crown, the Court found that the offender had set the fire and was guilty of arson disregard for human life. Given that other prisoners were in the jail locked in their cells, the offender would have been aware that his intentions posed a risk to human life.

R. v. C.J., 2025 ONSC 4970

In the 2025 case of R. v. C.J., the offender pled guilty to arson damage to property, arson by negligence, and arson with disregard for human life. The offender admitted to having set a number of fires around Ottawa including inside a multi-unit building. During her sentencing, the Court noted a number of on-going mental health issues, a sporadic work history, substance abuse issues, and a prior criminal record. The Court also noted that the number of fires set by the offender was aggravating as was the extent of the damage caused by the fires. The Court sentenced the offender to 16 months custody which was time served. The offender was also placed on 24 months’ probation, ordered to provide a sample of her DNA to the Court, attend a doctor for psychiatric care, abstain from drugs and alcohol, and not to possess weapons or incendiary or explosive devices for 10 years.

R. v. P.J., 2026 ONCA 79

In the 2026 case of R. v. P.J., the offender appealed his sentence after pleading guilty to arson disregard for human life and manslaughter after setting a fire that caused the death of three people. The Court found that the offender had thrown a Molotov cocktail at a home at the request of a drug dealer in exchange for drugs and money. The offender had been told that no one would be inside at the time. This, however, was not the case and three of the four people inside the residence died. The fire also caused well over $250,000 in damage to several neighboring residences. The offender was sentenced to 16 years in prison and ordered to pay $250,000 in restitution. He appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal. The Court upheld the prison sentences but quashed the restitution order given the lengthy prison term.

Donich Law - In the News
Donich Law - In the News - Media Logos

Breakfast Television

Mental Health Concerns in the Justice System.

CP24

The Difference between Criminal and Civil Liability.

CTV News National

The Rise of Gun Violence in Toronto.

Global News

New Changes to Pardons in Canada.

About the Author

Jordan Donich Profile Photo

Jordan Donich

Jordan Donich has been a Lawyer for over 10 years and is a trusted legal analyst by Canadian Media. He is as a leader in Canada’s tech sector for lawyers and developer of Law Newbie. Jordan is a Black Belt with the Japan Karate Association and trained in Krav Maga. He won a Gold Medal at 2004 Canadian National Championships and was published in the National Newspaper Awards.

Jordan has been featured in Forbes, Canadian Lawyer and is a member of DMZ Angels in Toronto.