Our Experience
The Ontario College of Pharmacists (OCP) regulates pharmacists in Ontario, with authority derived from legislation such as the Drug and Pharmacies Regulation Act (DPRA) and the Regulated Health Professions Act (RHPA). These regulatory systems help ensure that pharmacists are certified, licensed, and comply with the requisite professional standards expected from members of that profession. The OCP possesses the authority to investigate and penalize members of the College for professional misconduct. The goal of this is to protect the public and safeguard professional standards and expectations in the profession.
The Firm defends allegations where drugs have been dispensed improperly or sold for improper purposes by the licensee. In the Firms Case No. 9*****5 it defended a pharmacy manager belonging to a large Canadian business who was alleged to have shipped Fentanyl to a patient’s front door and left it unattended without proper dispensing or counselling standards. The matter was resolved without any finding of professional misconduct.
In a recent and significant case, Donich Law represented T.G., in its Case No. 2****2 where a pharmacist whose certificate of registration had been suspended by the Ontario College of Pharmacists (OCP) in relation to a misconduct investigation. The Health Inquiry Panel of the Inquiries, Complaints, and Reports Committee reviewed the submissions and decided to temporarily suspend the memebrs certificate of registration under Section 62 of the Health Professions Procedural Code.
The Firm was retained to make legal submissions before the Panel. As a result, the Planel agreed to modify the interim suspension and allow the member to continue operating their business.
- CP24: Civil Sexual Assault Lawsuit at St. Michael’s in Toronto.
- Global News Morning Show: Sentencing Arguments in Assault case of Dafonte Miller.
- Breakfast Television: Role of Mental Health in Court Proceedings.
- Global News National: Bruce McArthur will not serve consecutive sentences.
- CBC Radio: Interview with Mayor John Tory and Jordan Donich on CBC Radio.
- CTV News National: Handgun ban supported by majority of Canadians: Nanos survey.
- Global News: How difficult is it to get a legal handgun in Canada.
- CP24: Sentencing Hearing for Chair Girl.
What will Happen if I am Reported to the OCP?
Anyone may report a pharmacist to the Ontario College of Pharmacists for alleged professional misconduct. If a report is made, either the individual or institution making the report or the OCP will notify the pharmacist. The notification will include a Notification of Appointment of Investigator, indicating the start of an inquiry.
This process needs to be impartial and transparent. The complainant and the registrant of the College will both have a chance to present their side of their story. As a pharmacist, being co-operative throughout the investigations is usually seen as a mitigating factor by the investigator.
The pharmacist should be kept up-to-date with the developments and progress of the investigation. Moreover, the investigation can last up to several years. This makes it important to promptly seek legal advice.
What should I do if I have been Wrongfully Reported to the OCP?
If you have been falsely accused of misconduct, you should make sure to vigilantly document everything and retain all evidence. Moreover, you should carefully record all relevant details that pertain to the allegations. Ideally, your records should include the dates, times, location, and the persons involved in the documentation. All forms of communication should be documented, whether it is online or in person, spoken or written, and so on.
Engaging legal advice early can assist with navigating the inquiry process, drafting relevant responses, and ensuring legal compliance. Lawyers can offer strategic legal advice to defend professional qualifications and refute false accusations. Moreover, you can work closely alongside your lawyer to craft a strategic response to the allegations supported by clear evidence.
It is a good idea to not discuss the details of this investigation or case on social media, as it can have negative implications and create rumours. Most importantly, reach out to a trusted individual for emotional support throughout this emotionally taxing incident.
Professional Regulation in Canada
What is the Role of the Investigator?
An OCP investigator gathers evidence impartially to offer to the Inquiries, Complaints, and Reports Committee. The investigator’s role should be unbiased, with an emphasis on obtaining facts rather than deciding the outcome. This means that the investigator should focus solely on fact-finding, and to not form any personal opinions or thoughts about the pharmacist’s “guilt” or “innocence”.
As part of the evidence-gathering process, the investigator’s job involves conducting interviews with a variety of stakeholders, such as the complainant, the pharmacist who is under investigation, any witnesses to the incident(s), colleagues, and any other individual who might pertinent relevant information. These interviews are carried out in a professional manner to ensure that all opinions are considered fairly.
It is important to note that the investigator is expected to maintain strict confidentiality throughout the investigation.
What is the Role of the Inquiries, Complaints, and Reports Committee (ICRC)?
The ICRC evaluates investigation findings and determines the proper course of action. If professional misconduct is suspected, the Committee may close the file, impose sanctions, or submit the case to the Discipline Committee for further investigation and consideration.
The ICRC looks into and interprets the findings of the investigation provided by the OCP. Based on these findings, the IRCR determines the appropriate course of action moving forward.
Understanding Workplace Investigations
What Potential Penalties do Pharmacists Face for Misconduct?
Depending on the severity of the misconduct, the possible penalties that the College can impose might range from warnings and remediation programs to suspension or revocation of the licence. Following a thorough investigation and discipline process, the Discipline Committee sets the final decision by considering the nature, degree, and veracity of the allegations.
A formal warning or reprimand falls on the more “lenient” side of the punishments. Nonetheless, these usually stay on the pharmacists’ records and can affect future investigations negatively. Some examples of remediation programs that pharmacists might be ordered to take include ethics courses.
Recent Cases
Ontario (College of Pharmacists) v. Newman, 2020 ONCPDC 1
This case pertains to J.N., a pharmacist accused of several counts of professional misconduct relating to the distribution of naloxone kits. The claims included distributing naloxone without sufficient patient assessment, permitting non-pharmacists to dispense naloxone, and failing to comply with a commitment made to the College.
J.N., the ownerof a pharmacy in Ontario, helped distribute naloxone kits as part of a community outreach effort to tackle the opioid crisis. Despite his genuine intentions, J.N. was accused of failing to uphold the professional standards required for naloxone delivery.
The main claims against J.N. were that he supplied naloxone kits without performing the necessary patient assessments and allowed non-pharmacist workers to distribute them. Furthermore, there were allegations that J.N.’s employees misrepresented themselves as part of a government effort to encourage the distribution of naloxone kits. Furthermore, J.N. was accused of violating an agreement with the College by continuing to engage in actions that were inconsistent with the College’s instructions and orders.
The defence proceeded with an agreed-upon statement of facts, in which J.N. conceded to certain claims and acknowledged that his conduct fell short of the professional standards required of pharmacists. A joint submission resulted in a reprimand, a two-month suspension of J.N.’s certificate of registration (one month suspended pending completion of remedial training), and an Order to complete a professional ethics course. The College and the Discipline Committee took into account J.N.’s long-standing contribution to tackling the opioid crisis and his cooperative attitude during the investigation as mitigating factors.
The case shows us how important it is to adhere to professional norms, as well as pharmacists’ responsibility in public health programs. While J.N.’s actions were intended to save lives, the Discipline Committee emphasized the importance of regulatory compliance.
Ontario (College of Pharmacists) v. Kula, 2020 ONCPDC 5
In the case of Ontario College of Pharmacists v. A.K., heard on December 18, 2019, the Discipline Committee of the Ontario College of Pharmacists addressed allegations against A.K., who was accused of professional misconduct in relation to his role at Meds Via Canada (MVC) and the Medicine Shoppe pharmacy. The charges were around A.K.’s involvement in filling and dispensing prescription medications to customers in the United States without legitimate prescriptions and running an unaccredited internet pharmacy.
A.K. acknowledged to failing to maintain the professional standards anticipated in pharmacy practice, which violated several parts of the Drug and Pharmacies Regulation Act and the Food and Drug Regulations. The misconduct encompassed selling prescription drugs to patients in the United States without valid prescriptions, permitting non-accredited pharmacies to distribute these medications, and engaging in conduct that was considered to be dishonourable and unprofessional.
The inquiry discovered that A.K. helped Canadian prescribers co-sign U.S. prescriptions and transported drugs from the Medicine Shoppe to patients in the U.S. Despite the misconduct, A.K. was co-operative throughout the investigation, presented an agreed-upon statement of facts, and owned up to his transgressions.
The panel accepted A.K.’s joint submission on order and costs, which included a reprimand and a $10,000 cost penalty. A.K. also promised to retire permanently from the College and submit his registration certificate. The panel’s order here was intended to protect the public and send a firm message to the profession about the repercussions of such instances of misconduct.
Ontario (College of Pharmacists) v. Sargyos, 2019 ONCPDC 2
In the case of Ontario College of Pharmacists v. V.S., heard on December 18, 2018, the Ontario College of Pharmacists’ Discipline Committee found V.S., a pharmacist and designated manager at Simcoe Square Pharmacy, guilty of professional misconduct. The misbehaviour included failing to uphold professional standards, inadequate monitoring of her spouse, and incorrect medicine administration. Specifically, V.S. permitted returned and expired pharmaceuticals to remain in the dispensary, labelled drugs incorrectly, and failed to document transfers between pharmacies. Additionally, the pharmacist re-dispensed previously sold drugs.
The inquiry discovered that V.S.’s spouse, who is not a pharmacist, participated in these activities and attempted to impede the investigation. V.S. accepted the claims and cooperated with the investigation. The judges considered her actions to be unprofessional but not dishonest or disrespectful.
The disciplinary penalty included a reprimand, a four-month suspension (one month waived if remedial training was completed), a two-year ban on acting as a designated manager, and practice monitoring. V.S. was also required to finish both the ProBE ethics course and the College’s Jurisprudence Exam. Moreover, she was ordered to pay $5,000 in fees to the College.