Insurance Fraud

Insurance Fraud

An individual who commits insurance fraud, including employee health benefits fraud, will be charged with fraud pursuant to section 380(1) of the Criminal Code. Insurance fraud can refer to anything from slightly increasing the amount paid on a health benefit insurance claim to intentionally causing a significant accident in an attempt to collect insurance money.

A person commits fraud when they use deceit or false pretence to take money, property, a service or any other valuable security from a person, a business, or the public. Fraud offences are categorized based on the value of the fraud. If a person commits fraud valued at more than $5,000, they will be charged with fraud over $5,000. The penalties for this offence are more severe. If a person commits fraud valued at less than $5,000, they will be charged with fraud under $5,000 and will face less serious penalties. 

Examples

Person A has health benefits through their employer. Person A submits false claims for health care services they did not receive and collects money from their insurance company for those services. 

Person A intentionally crashes her car to collect insurance money for the vehicle. Person A collects money from her insurance company for the accident and is later arrested.

Cases

R. v. Mills, 2022 ONCA 404

In R. v. Mills, the accused, a tow truck driver, was convicted of one count of fraud over $5,000 after he staged a collision with another driver to collect insurance money. After the insurance claims had been submitted, police investigated the matter further and determined the accident was intentionally staged by the individuals. Both parties insurance companies suffered a loss.

Offence Specific Defences

Lack of Intent

To prove that an accused has committed fraud, the Crown must prove that the accused intentionally used deceit or false pretence to defraud another party. If the accused had no intent to commit fraud, they cannot be convicted of fraud. 

For example, person A purchases what they believe are authentic designer handbags from person B. Person A sells the bags, claiming they are authentic, to person C. Person C discovers the bags are knockoffs and believes person A has defrauded them. In reality, person A was tricked into believing the product was authentic. The only individual guilty of fraud in this scenario is person B who knew the handbags were knockoffs. 

No Risk of Loss

To be convicted of a fraud charge, the Crown must prove that the victim suffered a loss or was at risk of suffering a loss. If there was no real risk of loss to anyone, the accused has not committed an offence but may be convicted of another.